The $8M Poker Champion Who Physically Couldn't Lose

Video Description

At the two thousand seven World Series of Poker Main Event, a complete amateur went on a run that still doesn’t make sense. Jerry Yang wasn’t a seasoned pro. He wasn’t a high-stakes regular. He hadn’t even been playing poker for long. He qualified through a two hundred and twenty-five dollar satellite, entered the only WSOP event he played that year, and arrived with less than ten thousand dollars in lifetime tournament winnings. And then something strange happened. At the final table, elimination simply stopped working. All-ins held. Pressure worked. Opponents folded. Big moments broke his way. Hand after hand, Yang survived spots where he should have been out. This video breaks down Jerry Yang’s unbelievable final table run — the controversial hands, the momentum swings, the psychological warfare, and the moments that made it feel like he physically could not lose. Whether you see it as destiny, variance, or one of the wildest heaters in poker history, this remains one of the most debated WSOP wins of all time. And if you think this story is unbelievable… wait until you see what happened next. The #1 Training App for Poker Players - https://gtowizard.com/p/acesfullpoker Support The Channel - https://buymeacoffee.com/ewjaproductions Subscribe for In-Depth Poker Player Profiles, Unforgettable Poker Stories, and Shocking Poker Controversies. Inspired by legends like Phil Ivey, Doyle Brunson, and Daniel Negreanu. Our channel covers epic poker hands, legendary moments, and scandals that changed the game. Stay tuned for the latest deep dives, poker stories, and all the drama from the world of poker! RIGHT NOTICE: The Copyright Laws of the United States recognize a "fair use" of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: "Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright." This video and our YouTube channel, in general, may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above. Fair Dealing: Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988 (UK) section 30 states "Fair dealing" with a work for the purposes of criticism or review, of that or another work, does not infringe any copyright in the work provided that it is accompanied by a sufficient acknowledgement. Copyright in a work is not infringed by the use of a quotation from the work (whether for criticism or review or otherwise).-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------