I Do NOT Agree With UsefulCharts' Video On Jesus

Video Description

Link to the original video check them out! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIOd05_JOKY My video on Jesus https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrbX8DcENMg&t=2723s All the good links: Come watch me live stream on Twitch! Almost every night 9pm CST https://www.twitch.tv/metatrongemini Join this channel to get access to more old school Metatron videos the algorithm wouldn't prioritize! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIjGKyrdT4Gja0VLO40RlOw/join I have a Patreon page with extra content! https://www.patreon.com/themetatron My second channel about languages https://www.youtube.com/@metatronacademy My third channel about gaming https://www.youtube.com/@TheProtectorate-yq7vi My Twitter/X https://x.com/pureMetatron This is a response to the channel UsefulCharts. Convergence in textual Analysis and Historical Reliability presents us with both Christian and non Christian evidence supporting the existence of Jesus. For the purposes of this video, we will focus on the non Christian sources, as sources such as the apostle Paul, the gospels proper or any statement made by people who already believe by faith that Jesus is God, could be accused of being partial and bias. We do this to establish a basis of intellectual honesty in our research. But regardless of this parameter, we are still left with a plethora of material to work with. I'll substantiate this statement with more details on section 12. Let's define and delineate first which sources we have . The non Christian sources we have as evidence of Jesus' historical existence are mostly twofold. They come from Roman and Jewish authors. A dialectical analysis shows that these sources frequently manifest explicit antipathy towards Christianity. If they had a reason to question or doubt the existence of Jesus, it would have benefitted them to state it and use it. Yet no one does. This is a very important contextual clue. Historically Christianity shook the foundations of Roman theology and pagan worship within the empire, thus alerting the authorities causing a harsh imperial response towards the new rising religion. This is an fundamental socio political factor to consider, so keep it in mind as we carefully review the words of the ancients. There are usually 2 main counter arguments used to discredit the sources we are about to examine with the aim of rejecting them a priori or to significantly diminish their historical validity and relevance. 1 - The question of whether these authors wrote independently of Christian thought or influence. And 2 - the question of whether or not these sources are contemporary to Jesus' life. These logical structures are massive red flags. They are logical fallacies that should not be taken seriously by any historian, scholar or amateur, Christian apologetic or Atheist alike as they operate under a false correlation paradigm. We will address both arguments, counter attack and dismantle them to their very core on sections 10 and 11 respectively. Furthermore on section 11 I will demonstrate why the evidence we have for Jesus is in fact exceptional . There are multiple ancient sources that mention Jesus in a variety of ways, decrees of precision and contextual relevance. For this Systematic evaluation we will divide these into 2 categories: Dubious sources, and certain sources. The first category includes those sources that mentioned someone that we think could be Him, but we are not sure. They could be valid, but they have a lower reliability coefficient. The Certain sources are instead those that without question mention Him, and have a higher degree of verifiability. #metatron #jesus #history